Skip to main content
· 7/1/1855

Van Norden v. Buckley

Citations

  • 5 Cal. 283
  • 1855 Cal. LEXIS 111

Syllabus

<p>Whore payment by the maker to the indorser is relied upon as an excuse for want of demand and notice, it must be payment directly and specifically for the note, and not as security for all transactions in the aggregate.</p> <p>Where the maker did not specify that the payment to the inderser was to meet the indorsed note, the indorser had a right to apply it 10 any indebtedness he held against the maker, and to stand upon his strict legal rights, as to demand and notice in regard to the indorsed note.</p>

Judges: Heydenfeldt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.