Van Lilly v. South Carolina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the plan administrator acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it “simply ignored relevant medical evidence in order to arrive at the conclusion it desired”
• holding delegation of claims administration does not make claims administrator de facto plan administrator
• finding it arbitrary and capricious to deny benefits for fibromyalgia and chronic pain syndrome when claim was supported by ample evidence and administrator never requested any particular kind of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).