Van Laten v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Stating in a challenge to a zoning ordinance that the “testimony did not fix the extent of damages to [certain property]. The evidence does not establish any significant or measurable loss in value of such property”
• requirement that landowner must seek an amendment of the zoning ordinance before challenging the applicability of the ordinance to his land in court did not apply in the circumstances of this matter, where it have been futile for landowners to seek amendment of ordinance
• requirement that landowner must seek am amendment of the zoning ordinance before challenging the applicability of the ordinance to his land in court did not apply in the circumstances of this matter, where it have been futile for landowners to seek amendment of ordinance.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).