Skip to main content
· 12/8/2000

Van Hulle v. Pacific Telesis Corp.

Citations

  • 124 F. Supp. 2d 642
  • 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 557
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17914
  • 2000 WL 1808553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This Court thus concludes 6 that a plaintiff cannot maintain an ADA retaliation claim against entities which are not otherwise 7 subject to Subchapters I, II, and III of the ADA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fogel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.