Skip to main content
· 10/1/1895

Van Horn v. State ex rel. Abbott

Citations

  • 46 Neb. 62
  • 64 N.W. 365
  • 1895 Neb. LEXIS 438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because they are prohibited from practicing medicine, hospitals and nurses cannot pass on the efficacy of a course of treatment
  • \Whether negligence exists is determined by the relevant standard of conduct for the physician. That standard is proved through expert testimony.\
  • whether a standard of care articulated by an expert witness governs a duty of care is a question of fact, determined from all relevant facts and circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Irvine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.