Van Horn v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Title VII “does not provide for an action against an individual supervisor”
• noting that Title VII provides for actions against employers but not supervisors
• explaining that Title VII “does not provide for an action against an individual supervisor” (citing Bales v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 143 F.3d 1103, 1111 (8th Cir. 1998)); Davis v. Ricketts, No. 8:11CV221, 2011 WL 9369010, at (D. Neb. Nov. 14, 2011
• “To make out a retaliation claim, the plaintiff must show that the protected conduct was a determinative—not merely motivating—factor in the employer’s adverse employment decision.” (internal quotation omitted)
• “The district court properly granted [] judgment in favor of Mr. Clark on the Title VII claim because that law does not provide for an action against an individual supervisor. . . .”
• “[Title VII] does not provide for an action against an individual supervisor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).