Skip to main content
· 1/19/1979

Van Hoof v. City of Burnsville

Citations

  • 275 N.W.2d 44
  • 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing how antagonistic defenses can \turn[] one defendant into a witness hostile to the other defendant\
  • declining to find abuse of discretion when victim failed to disclose abuse in response to broadly asserted questions
  • same language and punctuation from statute defining sodomy creates three general but distinct ways to commit crime
  • district court did not act unreasonably when finding criminal history score and lack of violent or dangerous crimes did not merit departure sentence
  • \The party asserting an abuse of discretion bears the burden of establishing it.\
  • \The party asserting an abuse of discretion bears the burden of establishing it.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consideration, Otis, Peterson, Scott, Sheran, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.