Van Harris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that juvenile courts are “authorized to conclude that the petitioners failed to present evidence to support the SIJ factors or that their evidence was not credible”
• stating that the trial court \had a duty to consider the SIJ factors and make findings\
• stating that juvenile courts are \authorized to conclude that the petitioners failed to present evidence to support the SIJ factors or that their evidence was not credible\
• remanding case where juvenile court’s order was silent regarding any decision on the SIJ factors
• “Our review of the juvenile court’s decision is impaired by the lack of findings, and the child’s immigration status hangs in the balance.”
• “[T]he [juvenile] court had a duty to consider the SIJ factors and make findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).