Van Gundy v. P.T. Freeport Indonesia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A federal court sitting in diversity must apply the choice of law rules of the forum state to determine which state’s substantive law applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Samson v. Western Capital Partners LLC (In re Blixseth)
  D. Montana· 2013-03-18· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.
  Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
• Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 1,668×
• Casarotto v. Lombardi
  Montana Supreme Court· 1994-12-15· cited 46×
• Alaska Airlines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-05-07· cited 31×
• Keystone, Inc. v. Triad Systems Corp.
  Montana Supreme Court· 1998-12-30· cited 28×
• Charles E. Gilbert v. Tulane University (The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund)
  Fifth Circuit· 1990-08-15· cited 24×
• Dunbar v. Williams
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-11-16· cited 15×
• Wusthoff v. Bally's Casino Lakeshore Resort, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1998-02-25· cited 5×