VAN GROUW v. Malone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a client’s fraud claim against an attorney was “in substance, one for professional malpractice”
• holding that the plaintiff waived issues predicated on willful ignorance by failing to raise them until his motion to alter or amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).