Van Gesner v. United States
Citations
- 153 F. 46
- 82 C.C.A. 180
- 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4376
Syllabus
<p>1. Cbiminal Law — Review in Federal Courts — Election.</p> <p>In' a criminal case in a federal court which involves a constitutional question, after a judgment of conviction, the defendant is put to his election whether he will take the’ case direct to the Supreme Court of the-United States on such question, or take the whole case to the Circuit Court of Appeals, and, where he elects the former, a writ of error subsequently taken out to. the Circuit Court of Appeals will be dismissed.</p> <p>2. Public Lands — Regulations oe Land Department.</p> <p>The-Land Department of the United States has the power to make reasonable rules and regulations, not inconsistent with any valid law, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of the acts of Congress providing for the disposition of the public lands, which have the force and effect of law, and of which the courts take judicial notice.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 41, Public Lands,. S 288. ■</p> <p>Decisions of land department, their conclusiveness and effect, see note to Hartman, v. Warren, 22 C. C. A. 38Carson City Mining Co. v. North . Star Mining Co., -28 C. C. A. 344; Uriita Tunnel M. & T. Co. v. Creede &. C. O. M. & M. Co., 57 C. C. A. 207.]_-</p> <p>3. íeisjury — Public Lands — Application to Purchase — Timber and Stoke Act.</p> <p>Under Timber & Stone Act June 3, 1878, § 1, c. 131, 20 Stat. 89 [U. S. Comp. St. .1901, p. 1343], which requires applicants to purchase land thereunder to file a verified written statement, and after the required publication of notice to “furnish to the register of the Land Office satisfactory evidence'’ o£ certain facts, the regulations of llie Land Department, requiring such evidence to be in 1 lie form of depositions under oath, are in furtherance of the purposes of the statute aud valid, and false swearing in either the preliminary staiement or in such depositions constitutes the crime of perjurv and an offense against the United States, under
Judges: Gilbert, Morrow, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rumely v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1923-07-27· cited 56×
- Jones v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1908-05-04· cited 44×
- United States v. AlghazouliNinth Circuit· 2008-03-04· cited 42×
- Jones v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1910-05-16· cited 30×
- Heskett v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1932-05-16· cited 20×
- Howenstine v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1920-02-02· cited 20×
- Holsman v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1918-02-18· cited 18×
- Nickell v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1908-02-03· cited 9×
- Dwinnell v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1911-02-06· cited 1×
- United States v. AlghazouliNinth Circuit· 2008-03-03
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 235×
- United States v. EatonSupreme Court· 1892-04-25· cited 202×
- McLish v. RoffSupreme Court· 1891-12-07· cited 195×
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1893-10-30· cited 154×
- Cornelius v. KesselSupreme Court· 1888-11-26· cited 114×
- United States v. BuddSupreme Court· 1892-03-28· cited 92×
- Orchard v. AlexanderSupreme Court· 1895-04-01· cited 76×
- Hawley v. DillerSupreme Court· 1900-05-21· cited 74×
- Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Ninth Circuit· 1901-11-15· cited 43×
- Wolfson v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1900-04-10· cited 42×
- Olson v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1904-11-23· cited 23×
- United States v. HowardW.D. Tennessee· 1904-04-06· cited 21×
- Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California· 1900-09-24· cited 15×
- United States v. RhodesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri· 1887-01-15· cited 13×
- United States v. StevensD. Minnesota· 1890-11-05· cited 13×
- Noah v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1904-02-01· cited 9×
- Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. BillsSixth Circuit· 1904-03-16· cited 7×
- United States v. EddyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana· 1905-01-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.