Van Eck v. Cimahosky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Bivens action could be sustained against Department of Transportation officers
• noting that “the present [c]omplaint is disjunctive and often vague,” and, had the plaintiff not been pro se, “might possibly be dismissed for a failure of specificity”
• noting that “the present [c]omplaint is disjunctive and often vague,” and, had the plaintiff not been pro se, “might possibly be dismissed for a failure of specificity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).