Van Dine v. Gyuriska

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Ashford is still good law with respect to primary physical custody claims; holding that party seeking primary physical custody is entitled to de novo hearing; also implying by analogy that claims for legal custody cannot be addressed by hearing officer for same reasons
• stating that Ashford is still good law with respect to primary physical custody claims; holding that party seeking primary physical custody is entitled to de novo hearing; also implying by analogy that claims for legal custody cannot be addressed by hearing officer for same reasons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).