Van DeVeer v. RTJ, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the duty to warn was satisfied if the appellant knew or should have known of the dangerous condition due it being open and obvious
• adopting the Restatement’s articulation of the duty a landowner owes to an invitee
• adopting the Restatement’s articulation of the duty a landowner owes to an invitee
• whether condition was open and obvious was a question of fact for the jury that cannot be decided on summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).