Van Den Bosch v. Raemisch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that prison officials may impose restrictions on inmate correspondence if those restrictions “are reasonably related to legitimate penological interests” (quoting Turner, 482 U.S. at 89)
• noting that prison officials may impose restrictions on inmate correspondence if those restrictions “are reasonably related to legitimate penological interests” (quoting Turner, 482 U.S. at 89)
• banning newsletter that accused parole commission of manipulating and lying to inmates
• affirming summary judgment for prison on mail regulations related to security concerns
• “legitimate penological interests might include crime deterrence, prisoner rehabilitation, and protecting the safety of prison guards and inmates”
• “while the burden of persuasion is on the prisoner to disprove the validity of a regulation…defendants must still articulate their legitimate governmental interest in the regulation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).