Skip to main content
· 5/29/1969

Van Curler Development Corp. v. City of Schenectady

Citations

  • 59 Misc. 2d 621
  • 300 N.Y.S.2d 765
  • 1969 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that we typically consider an unpreserved argument only if the appellant urges plain-error review in the opening brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bascom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.