Van Croft v. Horrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court may consider any conduct, even that which does not result in a conviction, in determining a sentence under § 1B1.3
• holding that a court may consider conduct underlying the acquitted charge as long as the conduct was proved by a preponderance of the evidence
• holding that criminal conduct of which defendant is acquitted may be used as sentencing factor if proved by preponderance of the evidence
• holding that “a sentencing court may consider conduct of which a defendant has been acquitted”
• holding that “a jury’s verdict of acquittal does not prevent the sentencing court from considering conduct underlying the acquitted charge”
• holding that \a jury's verdict of acquittal does not prevent the sentencing court from considering conduct underlying the acquitted charge\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).