Skip to main content
· 3/12/1910

Van Buskirk v. Lawrence

Citations

  • 82 Kan. 76
  • 107 P. 538
  • 1910 Kan. LEXIS 195

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Tax Deeds — Selling Price Omitted — Misstatement of Cost of ■ Redemption — Presumptions. A tax deed based upon a sale to the county and an assignment of the certificate, which does not in terms state the sale price and which misstates the cost of redemption, which was the consideration for the assignment, is not void on its face if, from data furnished by the deed and the law, aided by the presumptions which may legitimately be indulged, the sale price may be ascertained and the recital corrected.</p>

Judges: Burch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.