Van Buren v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “where a proponent introduces inadmissible evidence, a court may permit the opponent to introduce similarly inadmissible evidence in rebuttal or engage in otherwise-improper cross-examination”
• stating that where defense counsel attempts to impeach a witness’s credibility by painting an incomplete picture, “the State may complete the picture with ‘appropriate detail’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).