Van Brunt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the three readings requirement need not restart after a substantial amendment, so long as the amendment is germane to the bill

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Parker v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-31· cited 35×
• Ward v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 33×
• Magee v. Boyd
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2015-03-02· cited 16×
• League of Women Voters of Honolulu v. State.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2021-11-04· cited 12×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-10-20· cited 88×
• State v. A.L.I.V.E. Voluntary
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-02-19· cited 49×
• People v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1971-05-17· cited 39×
• Malone v. Meekins
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1982-09-03· cited 36×
• Kadans v. Collins
  Supreme Court· 1972-01-10· cited 35×
• Van Brunt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-06-25· cited 19×
• People Ex Rel. County Collector v. Jeri, Ltd.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-05-29· cited 16×
• Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. Mitchell
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1976-05-24· cited 6×
• D. M. C. Corp v. Shriver
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1970-12-07· cited 3×