Van Bibber v. Julian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we could not “weigh the prejudice suffered” as a result of the exclusion of plaintiffs testimony because “we ha[d] no way of knowing what the plaintiffs testimony would have been”
• contract damages account for work completed, cost of finishing work, and contract balance due
• where “plaintiff object[ed] to the trial court empowering investigation by a court expert, and delegating its fact finding and decision making authority, all outside the adversary crucible,” we agreed that trial court “erred in this course of resolution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).