Skip to main content
· 9/18/1990

Van Arsdell v. Shumway

Citations

  • 798 P.2d 1298
  • 165 Ariz. 289
  • 70 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “state office” includes “any other office for which the electors of the entire state or subdivision of the state greater than a county are entitled to vote”
  • recognizing “county, district and precinct” and “state” as the “two levels” of government offices in Arizona
  • noting that the term state office refers to “any other office for which the electors of the entire state or subdivision of the state greater than a county are entitled to vote”
  • election contests “are purely statutory and dependent upon statutory provisions for their conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William E. Eubank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.