· 9/18/1990
Van Arsdell v. Shumway
Citations
- 798 P.2d 1298
- 165 Ariz. 289
- 70 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 233
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “state office” includes “any other office for which the electors of the entire state or subdivision of the state greater than a county are entitled to vote”
- recognizing “county, district and precinct” and “state” as the “two levels” of government offices in Arizona
- noting that the term state office refers to “any other office for which the electors of the entire state or subdivision of the state greater than a county are entitled to vote”
- election contests “are purely statutory and dependent upon statutory provisions for their conduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William E. Eubank
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.