Van Amringe v. Peabody

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the Kidnapping and Hostage Taking statutes were multiplici-tous for Double Jeopardy purposes
• denying motion to dismiss certain counts as being multiplicitous on basis that motion was premature and should be heard after the jury rendered its verdict on the counts
• denying as premature the “Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss Counts 7, 8, 9, and 10,” but agreeing that, should the defendant(s) be found guilty of these and Counts Two through Five, these convictions would “impermissibly overlap” in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).