Skip to main content
· 3/18/2009

Van Alstyne v. Electronic Scriptorium, Ltd.

Citations

  • 560 F.3d 199
  • 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1441
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5548
  • 2009 WL 692512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the SCA includes statutory language making punitive damages recoverable even in the absence of proof of actual damages
  • holding that the SCA includes statutory language making punitive damages recoverable even in the absence of proof of actual damages
  • holding that statutory minimum damages cannot be awarded in the absence of proof of actual damages
  • holding in the context of the SCA that “proof of actual damages is not required before an award of either punitive damages or attorney’s fees”
  • holding the SCA permits a plaintiff to recover punitive damages without showing actual damages
  • discussing jury award of $100,000 punitive damages where employer regularly accessed employee’s personal email account for over a year

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Shedd, Agee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.