Skip to main content
· 12/22/1976

Van Alen v. Dominick & Dominick, Inc.

Citations

  • 441 F. Supp. 389
  • 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • outlining elements of common-law fraudulent concealment claim; applying New York law
  • evidence of fraud must be “clear and convincing” and the inference of fraud must be “unequivocal”
  • \[I]t is clear that plaintiff has not proven common law fraud by clear and convincing evidence. It is not possible to draw an 'unequivocal' inference from the facts as recited above.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pierce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.