Skip to main content
· 2/10/1983

Valtz v. Penta Investment Corp.

Citations

  • 139 Cal. App. 3d 803
  • 188 Cal. Rptr. 922
  • 1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 1378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying California law to a shareholder’s demand to inspect a foreign corporation’s records and noting that such activity is not an internal corporate affair
  • “There is no right to a jury trial in a 24 mandamus proceeding but the superior court has the discretion to grant one if there is an issue of 25 fact essential to resolution of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown (Gerald)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.