· 2/10/1983
Valtz v. Penta Investment Corp.
Citations
- 139 Cal. App. 3d 803
- 188 Cal. Rptr. 922
- 1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 1378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying California law to a shareholder’s demand to inspect a foreign corporation’s records and noting that such activity is not an internal corporate affair
- “There is no right to a jury trial in a 24 mandamus proceeding but the superior court has the discretion to grant one if there is an issue of 25 fact essential to resolution of the case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown (Gerald)
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.