Valtierra v. Medtronic Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the denial of class certification due to \individualized facts and circumstances between each insurer and its insured . . . .\
• noting named plaintiffs' individual breach of contract claims proceeded despite affirming denial of class certification
• noting named plaintiffs' individual breach of contract claims proceeded despite affirming denial of class certification
• Noting “the insurance industry is already heavily regulated by the Department of Insurance, making exclusive regulatory jurisdiction of insurance companies, at least with respect to the payment of claims, within the Department of Insurance.” (Citations omitted.)
• affirming pre-discovery dismissal because the plaintiffs’ claims depended on non-uniform contracts between each plaintiff and the defendant, as well as on steps taken by each plaintiff leading up to the defendant’s alleged breach
• “The Court in Atalese has clarified the scope of this requirement in the context of arbitration clauses contained in consumer contracts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).