Valroy G. Watson v. Paul O'neill, Secretary of the Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “address[ing]” only those “objectionable evidentiary rulings” that had been “sufficiently identified and discussed in [the plaintiff’s] brief”
• finding a causal connection, in part, because of a supervisor’s derogatory racial comments
• “Absent a proper offer of proof, we review under the plain-error standard and reverse only if there has been a miscarriage of justice.”
• “As in Williams, Watson’s failure to make an assertion of retaliatory motive in relation to his non-selection as a Building Manager Specialist is fatal to his attempt to resurrect the issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).