Valore v. Islamic Republic of Iran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that actual connection between family members, despite familial relationship, can affect ultimate solatium award
• holding that the FSIA’s third element was satisfied because the plaintiff was harmed in an attack that occurred in Lebanon, not Iran
• holding that actual connection between family members, despite familial relationship, can affect ultimate solatium award
• holding that the FSIA’s third element was satisfied because the plaintiff was harmed in an attack that occurred in Lebanon, not Iran
• holding that FSIA courts may “take judicial notice of related proceedings and records in cases before the same court”
• concluding that Iran was designed a State Sponsor of Terrorism “in partial response” to a terrorist attack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).