Skip to main content
· 3/12/2001

Valmont Industries, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

Citations

  • 244 F.3d 454
  • 166 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2782
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that timing is among the most persuasive forms of circumstantial evidence of animus
  • describing proximity in time as the “strongest form of circumstantial evidence”
  • \[A]bsence of a meaningful investigation into allegedly impermissible conduct before imposing discipline is an accepted form of circumstantial evidence of antiunion animus.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener, Stewart, Rosenthal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.