Skip to main content
· 7/15/2004

Vallone v. Cna Financial Corporation

Citations

  • 375 F.3d 623
  • 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1001
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14610

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that ... “a modification that purports to vest welfare benefits must be contained in the plan documents and must be stated in clear and express language.”
  • finding that the district judge appropriately limited discovery on the plaintiffs’ benefits termination claim to the administrative record, when such a decision was subject to deferential review
  • stating that “the ‘lifetime’ nature of a welfare benefit does not operate to vest that benefit if the employer reserved the right to amend or terminate the benefit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.