Skip to main content
· 7/22/1981

Valley Nat. Bank of Arizona v. Meneghin

Citations

  • 634 P.2d 570
  • 130 Ariz. 119
  • 1981 Ariz. LEXIS 225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that absent fault of the court, \a judgment nunc pro tunc cannot be entered unless such judgment has been in fact previously rendered\
  • explaining judgment nunc pro tunc entered only when judgment previously rendered, except when delay caused by court itself
  • “[T]he time for appeal runs from the entry of the judgment nunc pro tunc . . . .”
  • “Any irregularity in procedure may be waived if a party expressly or implicitly consents to it, as by acquiescing or failing to object to the procedure.”
  • \an appeal can be taken from a judgment nunc pro tunc and ... the time for appeal runs from the entry of the judgment nunc pro tunc\
  • “[N]otice of appeal from the original judgment is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the appellate court even though the judgment has been amended if the amendment does not substantially alter the original judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Struckmeyer, Cameron, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.