Valley Bank of Nevada, a Nevada Banking Corporation v. Plus System, Inc., a Delaware Membership Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “inconsistent state laws on [ATM] transaction fees can coexist without conflict as long as each state regulates only its own banks”
• “[The plaintiff] speculates that other states will pass similar but inconsistent legislation....”
• “[a]n [a]et that applies evenhandedly certainly passes muster under the [Commerce [C]lause”
• “Direct regulation occurs when a state law directly 11 affects transactions that take place . . . entirely outside of the state’s borders. Such a statute is 12 invalid per se . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).