Supreme Court of Florida· 2/26/1981
Valle v. State
Citations
- 394 So. 2d 1004
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing for new trial because under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220, requiring State to disclose all witnesses, “It necessarily follows that the trial court must allow defense counsel the time to interview these persons to properly prepare for trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Valle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-12-11· cited 79×
- Valle v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-08-29· cited 60×
- State v. NaveiraSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-04-22· cited 40×
- Valle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-01-18· cited 36×
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-24· cited 32×
- Valle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-02· cited 31×
- Raulerson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-08-26· cited 26×
- Loren v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-05· cited 23×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-08· cited 22×
- Valle v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2006-08-11· cited 15×
- Aldridge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-12-22· cited 12×
- Banks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-19· cited 12×
- Sobel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-21· cited 5×
- Westbrook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-02· cited 1×
- Sobel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-13· cited 1×
- McDonald v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-21· cited 1×
- Manuel Valle v. Secretary for the DOCEleventh Circuit· 2006-08-11
- Katherine Magbanua v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-31
- Kelly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-19
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- Hawk v. OlsonSupreme Court· 1945-11-13· cited 348×
- White v. RagenSupreme Court· 1945-04-23· cited 338×
- Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-09-25· cited 106×
- United States v. Lloyd M. Pelton, United States of America v. Jacqueline RichEighth Circuit· 1978-07-24· cited 92×
- State v. DemastusWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-09-23· cited 73×
- Coker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-06-16· cited 29×
- State Ex Rel. West Virginia-Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. EnoWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1951-03-01· cited 21×
- Berriel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-03-13· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.