Court of Appeals of Georgia· 11/2/2006
Valle v. State
Citations
- 638 S.E.2d 394
- 282 Ga. App. 223
- 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3449
- 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 1361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, under Randolph, a co-tenant’s refusal to permit a search renders the search invalid as to him, but does not render the search invalid as to a co-tenant who validly consents
- “[A] warrantless entry into and search of a residence may be authorized by the voluntary consent of the individual whose property is searched.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruffin, Smith, Phipps
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court· 2006-03-22· cited 1,203×
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Georgia· 2004-11-08· cited 24×
- Mecale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-02-10· cited 13×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-31· cited 8×
- Dupree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-05-24· cited 7×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-11-20· cited 5×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-06-05· cited 5×
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-06-17· cited 4×
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-07-27· cited 3×
- Perdue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-01-26· cited 3×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-03-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.