Skip to main content
· 9/10/1993

Vallas v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 624 So. 2d 568
  • 1993 WL 341144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding business pursuits exclusion applicable and noting “we cannot say that the limited partnership, which was formed to buy and sell investment real property for capital gain, was not ‘an undertaking . . . for gain [or] profit’“
  • concluding “business pursuits” includes passive investment
  • “we -10- cannot say that the limited partnership, which was formed to buy and sell investment real property for capital gain, . . . was not a ‘business pursuit’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Almon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.