Vallade v. Parilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no absolute immunity because the Family Court’s order had been vacated, leaving the sheriffs department “without a directive from any court”
• dismissing a claim under § 1983 that failed to allege that the defendant officers were personally involved in a constitutional violation
• declining to dismiss claim based on absolute immunity where officers retained longarms without guidance from the court once the order by which they seized the longarms was vacated
• dismissing claim against Sheriff’s department with prejudice because “the Sheriff’s Department is an ‘administrative arm’ of the County, and, as such, the department cannot be sued separately”
• internal citations and quotation (S.D.N.Y. 1999), aff'd sub nom. Chan v. Pataki, 201 F.3d 430 marks omitted
• comparing longarms with other guns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).