Valiquette v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “dissonance between the objective medical assessments and the plaintiff’s description of the level of pain he was experiencing . . . merely poses the 15 question of the credibility of his subjective complaints, it does not answer it”
• “dissonance between the objective medical assessments and the plaintiff’s description of the level of pain he was experiencing . . . merely poses the question of the credibility of his subjective complaints, it does not answer it”
• “[S]ome dissonance between the objective medical assessments and the plaintiff’s description of the level of pain he was experiencing . . . merely poses the question of the credibility of his subjective complaints, it does not answer it.”
• “[S]ome dissonance between the objective medical assessments and the plaintiff’s description of the level of pain he was experiencing . . . merely poses the question of the credibility of his subjective complaints, it does not answer it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).