Valerij Afanasjev v. Thomas D. Hurlburt, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that victim statements summarized in a bill of indictment “were consistent with each other and were corroborated by the statements of non-victims,” and thus supported the district court’s probable cause determination
• finding a bill of indictment summarizing witness statements to be reliable in part because it “list[ed] the specific dates of events, include[d] the names of witnesses and victims, and detailed] the amount of money that was involved in each transaction”
• “[A] district court’s habeas review of a magistrate judge’s issuance of a certificate of extraditability is narrow.”
• unsworn 106-page foreign bill of indictment, which contained “detailed” summaries of witness statements and other hearsay evidence, was “sufficiently reliable evidence” on which to base probable-cause finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).