Skip to main content
· 8/31/1998

Valerie Bennett v. Marie Schmidt

Citations

  • 153 F.3d 516
  • 41 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 522
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21257
  • 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,622
  • 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1210
  • 1998 WL 546979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “I was turned down for a job because of my race” is all a plaintiff must say in order to state a claim for discrimination
  • explaining that \[c]omplaints need not plead law or match facts to every element of a legal theory\
  • noting that a complaint would satisfy Rule 8(a) if it alleged “I was turned down for a job because of my race”
  • declaring that plaintiffs should not be “larding their complaints with facts and legal theories”
  • declaring that plaintiffs should not be “larding their complaints with facts and legal theories”
  • instructing district courts to “keep the case moving” rather than “lavish[ ] attention on the complaint until the plaintiff gets it just right”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.