Valenzuela v. Silversmith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that federal courts cannot “assume they have subject matter jurisdiction for the purpose of deciding claims on the merits”
• explaining that federal courts cannot “assume they have subject matter jurisdiction for the purpose of deciding claims on the merits”
• “recogniz[ing] that 23 the detention language in § 1303 is analogous to the ‘in custody’ requirement contained 24 in other federal habeas statutes.”
• explaining that mootness “implicates . . . subject matter jurisdiction”
• considering appellees raised Tribal exhaustion in motion to dismiss, but the Tenth Circuit does not state whether the motion was brought under any particular rule 12(b) subsection
• bypassing the mootness question and resolving the case on exhaustion grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).