Valentino Maghee v. John Ault, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the period between the completion of direct review of the state court judgment and the application for post-conviction relief is counted towards the one-year limitation period
• explaining that the AEDPA’s statute of limitations tolls while state post-conviction proceedings are pending
• explaining that the AEDPA’s statute of limitations tolls while state post-conviction proceedings are pending
• rejecting movant's argument that the state court clerk's actions \lulled\ him into inaction
• “Equitable tolling is appropriate . . . where a defendant’s conduct lulls the prisoner into inaction.”
• “Equitable tolling is appropriate where extraordinary circumstances beyond a prisoner’s control make it impossible to file a petition on time, or where a defendant’s conduct lulls the prisoner into inaction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).