Valentino B Lee v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a party “may not switch theo- ries and transform [its] position on appeal”
• explaining that when a document contra- dicts the complaint’s allegations “about what the document is or says,” the document governs (internal quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing a district court may consider exhibits to a complaint when ruling on a motion to dismiss
• explaining that a motion for a new trial is not limited to arguments advanced in a pre-verdict motion
• noting that because “the plaintiff is the master of the complaint,” we will consider “all documents that are attached to the complaint or incorporated into it by reference” (cleaned up)
• holding that nearly identical allegations were conclusory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).