Skip to main content
· 10/22/1895

Valentine v. Insurance

Citations

  • 53 Ohio St. (N.S.) 660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the use of the comma is exceedingly arbitrary and indefi- nite”
  • noting that “the use of the comma is exceedingly arbitrary and indefinite”
  • defining piracy and interpreting “other” in the phrase “‘murder or robbery, or any other Case: 20-1548 Document: 43 Page: 16 Filed: 05/13/2021 16 NOAA MARYLAND, LLC v. GSA what is common is that the subject of all three clauses dif- fers from (is “other” than
  • statute criminalizing piracy on the high seas does not apply to robbery by noncitizen on ship belonging to foreign subjects
  • “The words ‘any person or persons,’ are broad enough to comprehend every human being” but are “limited to cases within the jurisdiction of the state”
  • statute criminalizing piracy on the high seas does not apply to robbery by noncitizen on ship belonging to foreign subjects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.