Skip to main content
· 7/28/1899

Valentine v. A. Colburn Co.

Citations

  • 10 Pa. Super. 453
  • 1899 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301

Syllabus

<p>Master and servant — Vice principal — Defective machinery — Question for jury.</p> <p>There being evidence that plaintiff was injured by operating defective machinery, that he was ignorant of the defect, although it had existed for some time, and that the condition of the machine had been reported to the superintendent of the department, the question of defendant’s liability was properly left to the jury.</p> <p>8tatement-~Dvidence — Allegata and probata.</p> <p>An allegation that a machine was defective and without proper guards is broad enough to warrant the admission of evidence tending to establish any defect in the machine which rendered it dangerous to the operator.</p>

Judges: Oblady, Pobteb, Porter, Rice, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.