Valentin D. Ochoa v. Interbrew America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n determining whether a challenged jurisdictional amount has been met, district courts are permitted only to assess the allegations in 5 Section 1332(c)(1
• “[I]n determining whether a challenged jurisdictional amount has been met, district courts are permitted only to assess the allegations in a complaint and not the validity ofany asserted defenses.”
• “[I]n determining whether a challenged jurisdictional amount has been met, district courts are permitted only to assess the allegations in a complaint and not the validity of any asserted defenses.”
• “[I]n determining whether a challenged jurisdictional amount has been met, district courts are permitted only to assess the allegations in a complaint and not the validity of any asserted defenses.”
• “[I]n determining whether a challenged jurisdictional amount has been met, district courts are permitted only to assess the allegations in a complaint and not the validity of any asserted defenses.”
• “[I]n determining whether a challenged jurisdictional amount has been met, district courts are permitted only to assess the allegations in a complaint and not the validity of any asserted defenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barbara D. Scherer v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
  Second Circuit· 2003-10-16· cited 294×
• Tongkook America, Inc. v. Shipton Sportswear Company
  Second Circuit· 1994-01-26· cited 254×
• The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. American National Bank And Trust Company Of Chicago
  Second Circuit· 1996-08-27· cited 121×
• Pratt Central Park Limited Partnership v. Dames & Moore, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-07-19· cited 74×
• Smith v. Manhattan Club Timeshare Ass'n
  S.D. New York· 2013-05-10· cited 21×
• Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.
  Second Circuit· 1996-08-27· cited 16×
• Schonfeld v. Hilliard
  S.D. New York· 1999-02-01· cited 13×
• Valhal Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, Engineers, Appellant/cross-Appellee
  Third Circuit· 1995-03-20· cited 12×
• Snyder v. Madera Broadcasting, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1995-01-17· cited 8×
• LDCIRCUIT, LLC v. Sprint Communications Co., LP
  D. Kansas· 2005-04-08· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.
  Supreme Court· 1938-02-28· cited 3,971×
• Sarah Zacharia v. Harbor Island Spa, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1982-06-25· cited 134×
• Reynolds Manufacturing Co. v. Mendoza
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-11-29· cited 100×
• Lee-Wright, Inc. v. Hall
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-08-20· cited 91×
• Mariana Deutsch and Abraham Deutsch v. Hewes Street Realty Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1966-03-30· cited 58×
• Greater Fort Worth & Tarrant County Community Action Agency v. Mims
  Texas Supreme Court· 1982-01-27· cited 48×
• Maxwell v. Lake
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1984-05-18· cited 28×
• SHESHUNOFF & CO., INC. v. Scholl
  Texas Supreme Court· 1978-04-12· cited 22×
• Dempsey v. King
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-11-16· cited 12×
• Computerose, Inc. v. Minor
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-07-03· cited 1×