Valenti v. Torrington Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant principal was not entitled to qualified immunity on retaliation claim
• “For § 1983 actions, the statute of limitations is based on ‘state-law statute of limitations for tort claims.’”
• “In the teaching context, adverse employment actions can include negative evaluation letters [and] express accusations of lying.”
• “[S]ince Valenti is a public employee with the school district, his class of one theory, that he was intentionally treated differently, is not available.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).