Valdovinos v. McGrath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \A 'facial' challenge ... means a claim that the law is 'invalid in toto — and therefore incapable of any valid application.' ” (quoting Steffel v. 415 U.S. 452
• \In Wolff v. McDonnell
• \[T]he Court has been chary about extending the [] presumption of vindictiveness when the likelihood of vindictiveness is not as pronounced as in ... Blackledge [v. Perry
• finding that the \least restrictive means” prong of RFRA was coextensive with the Supreme Court’s decision in Procunier v. Martinez
• \Under Storer v. Brown
• \In United States v. Robinson

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).