Valdez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that 1989 revisions to juvenile code made it the same as a criminal prosecution, thus requiring jury trial
• \The revisions found in the Juvenile Code of 1989 were designed to promote and further safeguard the interests of accused juvenile offenders.\
• due process standard of fundamental fairness maintained by enactment of Arkansas Juvenile Code without affording a jury trial
• due process standard of fundamental fairness maintained by enactment of Arkansas Juvenile Code without affording a jury trial
• “The revisions found in the Juvenile Code of 1989 were designed to promote and further safeguard the interests of accused juvenile offenders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re L.M.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-06-20· cited 52×
• Allstate Insurance Company v. Mark Burrough, Garnette Bell, Individually and as Next Friend of Kenyatta Williams
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-08-28· cited 24×
• State ex rel. D.J.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2002-05-14· cited 20×
• State ex rel. A.J.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2009-12-01· cited 10×
• X.O.P. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-08-27· cited 4×
• In Re State Ex Rel. AJ
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2009-12-01
• State Ex Rel. Dj
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2002-05-14
• In Re LM
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-06-20
• Allstate Ins. Co. v. Garnette Bell
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-07-23

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,332×
• Elkins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1983-02-02· cited 1×