Valdez v. Mountain Bell Telephone Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute of limitations begins to run from the date of each injury where a structure causes temporary but repeated injuries, in contrast to the statute running from the date of construction where the existence of the structure itself is the injury
• reciting law that “[a] permanent structure or nuisance is one that may not be readily remedied, removed or abated at a reasonable expense, or one of a durable character ... costing as much to alter as to build”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).